Ok, maybe that’s a bit harsh. But still, I’m frustrated.

I’ve spent the last few weeks (and will spend the next few) thinking up nice, original presents for friends and family. A silly DVD set for one friend, a mini-keg of Root Beer for my brother (don’t read this, Curran). Although it is work, I enjoy it because it’s worth them getting something they they truly like.

I appreciate this treatment as well…I’d much rather be surprised than get something that is “exactly” what I want…most of the time “exactly” is actually “approximately” and requires numerous trips to the store to return and exchange stuff.

I respect that many people don’t have the time/interest/capability to come up with a unique and fulfilling present, especially family (after all, presents from family are required, whereas they’re opted into with friends). I usually try to come up with a short list of things I would like that I wouldn’t buy myself. This year, there’s just one thing on that list: A Nintendo Wii.

I used to be a big-time gamer (even developed levels for Myth II), but I have since run out of time and money to keep up with games. However, the Wii really eliminates the time factor. I’ve played it a few times and it’s easy to pick up, play with friends, and have a great short session (unlike the long shooters and strategy games I played back in the day). I’m not going to buy it for myself; I need to save money and any splurging goes towards instruments for Monsters are not Myths or brief vacations. Thus, it is a perfect gift.

I understand that the Wii is not cheap, but my birthday is right after Christmas and I figured all the family presents could combine into it. If not, that’s fine…find out where you can find a Wii and give some gift certificates.

However, this seems not to be the case and I’m now being hounded for more present ideas from my own family. As stated above, I ALREADY spent my creative juices figuring out presents for THEM.

In short, I don’t care anymore. What I want is to be left alone. I spend enough time working at work and on music that I should not need to spend time coming up with my own present. If they can’t, then my present should be not having to deal with the hassle of presents. Honestly, that would be fine with me. Let me enjoy the holidays and give presents without having to write even one more Christmas list or go to any stores to return lame presents. Give me the gift of not having to be stressed about a PRESENT for MYSELF.

Merry Christmas.

Update: My friend Victoria Potter just wrote a great post looking at the larger, less selfish picture of why Christmas/December is no longer cool. Scope it on her blog.

Blogged with Flock

Tags: EvanHamilton, Christmas, presents, Monsters are not Myths, MANM, Myth II, family, returns, curmudgeon, Victoria Potter

I just wrote the following frenzy of text after reading this on Kevin Gamble’s blog:

“It’s not a community if everyone doesn’t feel free to participate as an equal. As soon as you make this someone’s job you devalue the contributions of everyone.”

I think the heart of Kevin’s post is in the exact right place. However, I think it’s entirely incorrect to say that making community work someone’s job devalues it; it doesn’t change the value at all, it just focuses it in a more useful way for the company.  While Kevin’s “conversational” aspiration is fantastic (and I think can be part of the community job), I think it’s idealistic to think that almost any company can have their best possible relationship with their community without someone focusing on it, at least part time.

For the record, a few things: I work at Flock as a Community Ambassador.  I am certainly biased.  I will refer to the position that we’re discussing here as Community Ambassador, but it has also been called Community Advocate/Evangelist/Manager (I’ll state my take on the “Manager” title later in the post).  I think Kevin’s heart is in the right place, but I truly believe in this position.

Here’s why this job is important:

Community is important
I don’t think Kevin denies this, but I think it’s important to state: your community is what keeps your company afloat, and (hopefully) the goal of your company was and is to make the lives of your community better in some way.  If you don’t listen to your community, you are either going to fail or you will have to get very lucky.  Methods may differ, but for the most part you’ll find that successful companies listen to their community.

Companies are not inclined to state what they’re doing
Companies like to have big unveilings, to surprise their audience, and (frankly) to keep their ideas secret so they don’t get ripped off. Communication between releases is not in their nature. However, it is part of human nature to want to know what’s going on and part of human nature to talk about things they’re excited about.  I know people who are just short of physically upset when they don’t know what Flock is up to, even if it’s as simple as “planning our holiday party”. I mentioned our new Twitter account on our blog last week and within 5 hours more than 70 people had started following it. People want to know what’s going on, and employees want to talk about it…but companies are built by default not to do this. Unless you’re blessed with an executive staff that is open-minded AND takes the initiative to make the time to write and/or approve posts, this isn’t going to happen on it’s own.

Customer feedback is, by it’s nature, raw and biased
Of course my feedback about a product I use is going to be biased…I bought it for me, and it should work for me! But how is Apple supposed to treat my feedback that the new iPod Nano doesn’t fit in the mini-pocket of my jeans? Alongside (probably) millions of other pieces of feedback, where does this factor in? Again, time becomes an issue: does Jobs have time to read and absorb all this feedback and do his regular work?  Unlikely. While I’m fully in support of employees at all levels of a company reading community feedback (which we do at Flock, from QA to CEO), it’s unrealistic to count on this. Having a Community Ambassador to absorb, categorize, and interpret this feedback is key. Nobody at Flock would have guessed that Picasa was important to our community, but through gradual collection of votes (on our site, blogs, and via direct feedback) it became clear that Picasa integration is much more important to our existing community than any other service.

That said, I totally agree that the Community Ambassador should not be the single point of failure. Going back to the point about feedback being biased….even if 20 angry people like me write to Apple asking for iPod Nanos that fit our mini-pockets, that’s ignoring the millions of people who don’t care or even like the size. Both the Community Ambassador and the company they work for must take this all into consideration. User testing should be done, and ideas from directly within the company shouldn’t take backseat to community feedback…they should ride together, as equally viable ideas.

People like to get pumped
I understand where the inclination to stay “hands off” of evangelism comes from. Nothing is grosser than an employee (especially an executive!) putting on a big fake smile and blabbing on about how great the latest product is. However, I think that if you accomplish what Jeremiah suggests in his post on the topic, you are part of your community as much as your company. Once you are a legitimate part of your community, you are taken seriously by them (though you can easily compromise this by not being honest). If you truly are excited about your product (which you should be, or you should get a new job), you should express this to the people whom you know are excited about your product. If I care about, say, the band Queens of the Stone Age, I might join their Street Team or mailing list. If their Community Ambassador then contacts me telling me about how awesome the new album is (especially if it’s “insider” news), I’m going to be stoked! If he tells me they’re going on a new tour that is going to be wild and crazy and gives me the link to buy tickets, I’m not going to feel advertised to…I’m going to click that link and look at the tour dates! It’s all about being honest and genuine and only evangelizing to those who opt-in in some way.

Everybody should be part-time Community Ambassador
I agree with Kevin…the position of Community Ambassador absolutely does not absolve anyone in the organization of interaction with the community. As we do at Flock, the executives should blog, read feedback, respond to customers, and meet the community. This is essential to your organization, and the position of Community Ambassador should not affect this one way or another.

In the end, I understand where these anti-Community Ambassador posts come from. The position is often called Community Manager, which is a gross mischaracterization and invokes scary undertones. Many people claim to be interested in “community”, but describe it as a sort of asset (”Oh yeah, we got one of them community things. I hear they’re good for business.”) And the intrusive, look-we’re-cool-too style of advertising is so pervasive that it makes me physically angry when I hear a 40-year-old on the radio talk about how “sweet” and “stylin’” you’ll be with some “urban groove” on your “sweet mp3 player”. That is not community work…that is lame, dishonest advertising. The Community Ambassador is not an advertiser…he/she is simultaneously a member of the company and the community, and the guide for communication between them. He/she is not the be-all, end-all. He/she is not the single point of communication. He/she is not always right. He/she is just helping the flow of communication between those who make and those who use a product.  And if that’s not an important role, I don’t know what is.

Blogged with Flock

Tags: CommunityAmbassador, community, “Community Manager, Flock, “Jeremiah Owyang, “Kevin Gamble, customer, “customer feedback

I was driving into work at Flock today, listening to Wilco’s album A Ghost is Born, and “Company In My Back” came on. I’ve listened to this album several times, but I received it from a friend along with three other Wilco albums, so I haven’t truly absorbed it yet. “Company In My Back” felt so right this morning that I had to give it a review of it’s own.

At the start of this song you can hear what was likely the folky riff that the song originated from. In true form, Wilco has taken this to a totally different place, using rhythmic breaks to make this intro as poppy as it is folky. It’s totally familiar and different at the same time.

Instead of committing to one of these styles, the verse launches with bass as the primary instrument. Acoustic guitar strumming and riffs compliment this bassline, but float between styles successfully, making the focus of the verse the vocals. Which is appropriate, considering the ugly, lustful lyrics that somehow also border on beautiful with Tweedy’s soft, unconcerned voice.

I attack with you, pure bug beauty
I curl my lips and crawl up to you
And your afternoon
And I’ve been puking

The chorus, rather than continuing to be subversively vague, hits full force with a confident drumbeat and the revelatory (but not really) lyric of “Holy shit there’s a company in my back”. We barely get a sense of the fantastic chorus melody before we’re dropped back into the verse, this time with a more solid rhythm and some sustained chords on the piano. The melody varies a bit here, which keeps us from getting bored.

The second chorus hits with even more force, and the full beauty of the melody becomes more apparent, backed by an orchestra of what I think are mandolins. The beauty of the melody should clash with the dark wording of the chorus, but it doesn’t. Instead, I hear the beauty of how screwed up life can be.

The third verse continues to play with our perceptions of what this song is, throwing in a synth riff that could just as well be in a Madonna song.

The final chorus leaves us with one last taste of that brilliant chorus melody and then dissolves into genre-crossing instrumentation that ends with that incredibly unique and compelling intro riff. I’m happy at the end of this song, but not satisfied. I want that chorus melody to go on and on, backed by a million clinking mandolins. And in a way, it does…you walk through the rest of your day with that orchestra right behind you, making the sorry state of the world something to appreciate just as much as the good things in life.

Blogged with Flock

Tags: Wilco, Company In My Back, A Ghost is Born, Evan Hamilton, review, music, folk, pop

I don’t have the time to create a big writeup, and I’m sure most of it has been said already. BarCampBlock 2007 (for the time I was able to attend) was really fun and informative. Aside from some bottlenecks around the Socialtext offices, it seemed to go off without a hitch. I had a great time and can’t wait for the next one. Thanks to the sponsors!

A session on Microformats. If you look closely you can see folks from Songbird and Flock.

The floor at IDEO.

The obligatory crowd shot.

The bathroom signs at Socialtext.

The remains of lunch, sponsored by Google.

The wall of schedules.

Find the rest of the photos I took at my Flickr. If you see yourself or someone you know in these shots, add a note, tag or comment!

Blogged with Flock

I’m at BarCampBlock today (Saturday, Aug 18th), wiki-izing knowledge and meeting great folks.  Come join me!  I have lots of Flock swag to give away and I’d love to have some enlightening conversations.  Here’s what I look like today:

More info on BarCampBlock at http://barcamp.org/BarCampBlock

Seeya there!

Blogged with Flock

Tags: BarCampBlock, Evan Hamilton, Flock

Sorry for so few blogs, I am completely overwhelmed with being the only marketing person at Flock. Don’t worry, things are well and good. I just don’t have the time to blog.

I came across this while looking for Henry Rollins videos on YouTube. I have worshiped Rollins for several years, and his Black Flag tour journal book, “Get In The Van”, has a permanent place on my coffee table. I figured this would have relevance to you all.
GRR. The video will not embed. YouTube and/or Wordpress, I am extremely frustrated with you.  This is not supposed to be hard.

The video is HERE.

I keep having to remind myself (or get reminded by folks like Rollins) that this is a serious issue. Let’s all remember to do what we can.

Blogged with Flock

Tags: henry, rollins, “Henry Rollins, “Get In The Van, neutrality, “Net Neutrality,

Why haven’t I been blogging? In short, Twitter.

I have been insanely busy. Too busy to deal with the strange invisible rule telling me that I have to write long, profound blog posts.

I know, it’s silly. It’s my blog. While I’d love to inspire a few minds, this is my mental output. I don’t have to do anything but what I want to. So why do I feel like I can’t write a paragraph-long post about my day?

At the Social Media Club Workshop I attended on Monday, there was much discussion about why blogs did not become “the next big (social) thing”. Experts had predicted blogs would rise up as the predominant online social tool…and then they didn’t. After the surge in popularity, blogs became a common sight on the social web…but not a soaring, viral phenomenon like everyone expected.

Why did this happen? Where does this leave predictions about the next big thing? I think we sabotaged ourselves (I use “we” loosely as I only recently began doing what would officially be called “blogging”). And I don’t think it’s bad. Let’s look at the elements that contributed to this.

1. Tools
The blogging tools that exist do not lend themselves to short, light writing. Even Flock’s delightfully simple and usable blog editor has options for formatting, photos, html, tags, and more. And we still have a laundry list of advanced options that our community requests daily (Tony Fardon’s BlogPlus Extension fills this gap nicely). Even the themes surrounding many blogs makes a single paragraph look overwhelmed (Example Here). This is not welcoming to the kind of people who avoid word processors as much as possible or don’t know what html is.

2. The Over-hyped Decline of Traditional News Media
At the same time that blogging became a rising star, traditional news media began a noticeable decline. Did blogging cause this? No. It may have contributed. But what I feel was more of a factor was that people wanted (and could finally get) fast, visual, and relevant news. The proliferation of high-speed internet (fast), the rise of YouTube (visual), and the introduction of user-rated news like Digg (relevant) all hastened the decline of the 5 o’clock news hour. Those seeking the fast/visual/relevant combo discovered that “the next big thing”, blogs, didn’t always provide this. And so these people pushed blogs aside in favor of piano-playing cats.

3. Community
Again, this isn’t a bad thing. This is a great thing. The people that eventually became the blogging “community” are the people that stunted it’s growth. In the blogsphere, there is an emphasis on readers, not “friends” (including a lack of “collecting friends” mentality), and on colleagues/contemporaries rather than hookups (ignoring the rule of successful social apps: get people laid). Very few us of are friend whores or glitter graphics lovers, and thus we turn those people off. The fact is, there are a lot more of these glitter graphics kids than there are writers with the interest, talent, and focus to write several paragraphs of intelligent text for a dubious number of internet readers. We drove away the MySpace crowd.

Don’t fret! This is fantastic! We live in an idyllic community because we didn’t become “the next big thing”. We don’t have to deal with the pressure of having new companies riding their money on our success every day. We don’t have to deal with millions of “omg i luvz the blogz yo” posts or serious lawsuits. Bloggers, rejoice in not being the next big thing.

What is the next big thing? For now, Twitter and nanoblogging/microblogging/tumblogging/whatever it’s called this week. There’s much less of a barrier here. All I can do is customize my background, add a few tiny notes about myself, and write 140 characters. And sometimes, at the end of the day, it’s all I can do to write 140 characters about what I’m thinking. Is this bad for blogs? Who knows. I doubt it. After all, it says something that what began as a short excuse for not writing blogs became a whole blog post about the matter.

Blogged with Flock

Tags: Twitter, community, blog, blogging, Digg, YouTube, “Social Media Club Workshop, “Social Media Club, Flock, social, “social networking, tumblogging, nanoblogging, miniblogging

I just discovered stikis.com, thanks to Mashable; I may be addicted.

I am constantly using real sticky notes around my cube. Some are on the desk. Some are on the monitor. Some are probably under all those papers to my left. Some travel home in my laptop to hopefully remind me of what I need to do in my personal life. Sometimes I just send emails to myself with tasks. I’ve even tried Outlook (uugh) Tasks. All these combine to some semblance of keeping on top of what I have to do, but it’s just awkward.

Stikis (theoretically) solves this by giving you a website that you put your sticky notes on. You no longer have to worry about being in your office or even on the right computer to know what you should be doing. Choose from five different colors (all nice except for the glaring yellow and green…perhaps that’s for those really important notes) and resize and move as you need to.

(names blurred to protect the corrupt)

I’ve put all my permanent, evolving stikis (the status of conversations with outside companies, my priorities for the week) in one color off to the right, personal stuff down on the left in another color, and left plenty of room to replace the roaming paper stickies that normally bury my office.

I’m digging it now. Will I actually be better organized after this? We’ll see…I’ll post again after a few weeks of use.

Blogged with Flock

Tags: stikis.com, sticky notes, organization

Seriously though, I’m actually excited to see this screen. It means we’re reaching the final bits of development for Flock 0.8. Now that I’ve resolved the memory issue on my machine (it was due to Norton Antivirus 2003 and we’re looking into how to fix it for other people) I’m really getting to use the product constantly. It’s looking great: Pretty, simple, powerful! Those who are still using Flock 0.7 are going to love 0.8.

Meanwhile, the new Flock website progresses…it’s starting to come together and look pretty nice. We also have lots of neat research projects set up that are letting us get some great data on what people want to with Flock now and in the future. I never thought I’d be so excited about data, but I think it will really make the Flock experience now and in the future really amazing.

I’m bummed that I haven’t been able to blog more, but once the rush to get everything in my court done for 0.8 is over, I’ll really be able to sit back and talk to the Flock community, write a bit, and explore all the new things on the social web.

Keep on Flockin’!

Blogged with Flock

Tags: Flock, Flock Web Browser, flock, “Norton Antivirus, blog, “Spalsh Screen, 0.8

Just read Tara Hunt’s blog post regarding bite size data and broken attention spans.  As a multi-tasker who has a family member with ADHD, I felt compelled to wade in.

To be clear: I’m not a doctor.  I’m not a scientist.  I’m not a psychologist, though I work with people and what they think.  But let’s face it, doctors consistently change their views on even the most important things.  This isn’t bad; this is medical research progressing.  But with that in mind, let’s look at what’s going on without any of the current medical research gumming up the works.

Split Attenion

I spend most of my day doing at least 3 things.  I constantly have chat windows open (AIM, MSN, IRC, and Gmail chat), I receive regular email notifications, I’m busy in Office applications, I’m Twittering, I’m checking my SNS and blogging and working.  This is normal at Flock.  This is normal in most places.

If I had told my father when I was a kid that I’d be doing this, he would have laughed at me.  He grew up in a time when you did maybe two things at once.  These days, however, he’s forced to multitask.  He drives his container-carrying trailer to the job while talking to clients on the phone and getting pages from others.  He wouldn’t have chosen it, but even his two-task-trained mind has adjusted to handle this.

By comparison, I grew up multitasking.  TV and computer (a habit I’ve tried to break and mostly succeeded) were my evenings.  While I absorbed theatrical elements and plot development from the tube (the original tube), I spoke with friends online, played games, found random stuff online, and/or worked on my own little projects.  I felt bad about this at the time; kids weren’t supposed to do this.  We were supposed to concentrate on our homework.

Cons

To be fair, I didn’t come out of this as a multi-million dollar champ who laughed in the face of parents and old teachers.  In fact, my grades were less than good and my college options were limited.  When I took my first difficult college class (Astronomy) I nearly failed because I simply couldn’t absorb that much straight data.

Like Tara, I learned to focus my energy.  In a way, it’s a sort of balance.  I now enjoy the concentration taken to focus on a single piece of writing (reading or creating) because I know I’m really getting something out of it.  Once I finish, I relish the dive back into multiple streams of data and creation.

Is this for everyone?  No.  Figuring out how to concentrate my multi-tasking brain wasn’t fun, and if I had screwed up badly enough I would have regretted it.

Where is this all going?

So what is the answer?  Are we all crippling ourselves?  Tara disagrees.  “It sounds a little like evolution to me.”  YES!  I think one of the most-overlooked elements of evolution is the evolution of thought processes.  It is a much faster evolution than that of our bodies.  Frankly, I think this has been labeled Anthropology and Psychology and left alone by scientists of evolution.  But it’s fascinating to think of all the unresearched gaps here.  Why is it that I (with my inferior single concentration) can figure out a technical device that I have no experience with, while my father (with superior concentration) can’t?  I refuse to attribute this all to “experience with technology”.  My dad has plenty of technology and has had it for awhile.  It’s our BRAINS that are different.

So, is this good?  I think the truth is that no one knows.  Is all evolution good?  No.  Evolution is a reaction to environmental circumstances.  It does not take into consideration how things might change in the future.  It doesn’t take into account that this change might be temporary.  If all computers died today, we might be crippled.  We might die off, leaving only the John Locke’s.

What do I think the result of this will be?  I think increased creativity is the most fantastic element of this.  Previously, one had to dedicate specfic time to creation.  Only those with lots of time or the ability to concentrate and create in short periods really revolutionized things.

Now, we all have the time (due to multi-tasking) to imagine and create.  “User-generated content” is a big buzzword right now, but nobody seems to be thinking about it on a deeper level.  Is the internet or technology the real reason for more user-generated content?  No, the real reason is these people have the ability to create and imagine in the space between moments.

This isn’t all good.  In fact, I attribute it to the creation of many crappy, crappy bands.  They have time to work and work on songs until they’re just enough above craptastic to be slightly marketable.  But I think that, by far, the result has been positive.  From the fantastic collections of data on the internet to the myriad of blogger opinions to the startup businesses created in spare time or an afternoon…we’re truly experiencing a renaissance, and it’s because of this ability to split our concentration.

The end to this enormous diatribe is rather simple: don’t fight this.  We’ve stifled evolution as much as we can with chemicals, confines, prosthetics and the like.  Let’s not kill the one, amazing evolution occurring in our brains right now.

As Tara said: “Information overload is painful, yes, but it is necessary, I believe, for our personal advancement.”  Amen.  And now I’m off to Twitter, Gmail, and Flock.  Hm, maybe a little IM too.

Blogged with Flock

Tags: TaraHunt, evolution, creativity, ADD, ADHD, multi-tasking, Twitter, IM